COMPANY
DIGITAL ANALOGS
E&P TREATISE
SERVICES
E&P BENEFITS
News&Events
info@ccreservoirs.com

E&P Synthesis - Clastic Reservoirs

SEARCH

   

Carbonate Reservoirs
Clastic Reservoirs
Fractured Reservoirs

The E&P Synthesis on Clastic Reservoirs addresses practical distinction of different clastic play types and understanding of the various controls on reservoir performance and recovery efficiency using 200 clastic field analogs worldwide. We classified various clastic reservoir plays with emphasis on reservoir distribution and architecture. Six major play types have been defined: 1) fluvial plays, 2) desert plays, 3) lacustrine plays, 4) coastal plays, 5) deep-marine plays, and 6) glaciogenic plays. For each play type, important exploration lessons are summarized by: 1) examining the pre-discovery concepts, including evolution of concepts and discovery methods and 2) analysing the test results of exploration wells and their implications. These are followed by detailed discussions on the various play elements (i.e., reservoir distribution and external geometry, depositional facies and reservoir architecture, reservoir quality, source rock characteristics, trapping configuration) and their coordination in petroleum systems to provide better exploration approaches and strategies for the various play types.

For the purpose of field development, the studied reservoirs have been grouped by examining their production history. The geological, fluid and engineering features within each of the groups are analyzed to find out the most important factors in producing the observed production consequences. This approach has produced five groups of clastic reservoirs: 1) heavy oil/tar reservoirs, 2) low-permeability conventional-oil reservoirs, 3) intermediate-permeability conventional-oil reservoirs, 4) high-permeability conventional-oil reservoirs, and 5) gas and gas condensate reservoirs. For each reservoir type, multi-variable statistical analyses have been carried out in order to understand the relationship between recovery efficiency on the one hand, and API gravity, viscosity, well spacing, reservoir depth, field size, depositional facies, reservoir architecture, net/gross ratio, drive mechanism and poro-perm characteristics. Systematic analysis and comparison of depletion curves for the different reservoir types and/or under different producing mechanisms have allowed a better understanding of the various controls on reservoir performance and recovery efficiency. [view outline]